Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 17:21:44 +0200

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 05:05:33PM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Ping? Can we switch from intptr_t to void*?

Can we just go back to the original state?

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Valery Ushakov
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

References:
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

Prev by Date: Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
Next by Date: Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
Previous by Thread: Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
Next by Thread: Re: EV_SET() better C++ compat with alternative implementations
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index