On 10.03.2020 00:07, Greg Troxel wrote: > Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> writes: > >> On 09.03.2020 20:05, Martin Husemann wrote: >>> This is pretty stupid, but IMHO no big deal. We can >>> >> [...] >>> - just not support (i.e. #error) on older C++ standard compiles >> >> There are still many programs in pkgsrc that set older C++ release. Some >> of them are hard to upgrade. >> >> $ git grep c++03|wc -l >> 206 >> $ git grep c++98|wc -l >> 9 > > Given that there are multiple sublanguages, a program written (more or > less correctly) in an older one that specifies --std for it seems > entirely ok, and not in need of fixing. True? > libc++ still can expect max_align_t internally (at least today).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature