tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: package build failures on netbsd-8 using nbtar, pax, bsdtar
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 08:10:04PM -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
> This is about a system with netbsd-8 built with sources updated on
> 2020-02-14.
>
> I updated pkgsrc, and several sphinx packages are failing to build.
> With help from adam@, I have narrowed it down to bad extraction from the
> upstream tarball.
>
> The package is /usr/pkgsrc/textproc/py-sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml
> which was recently updated to 1.1.4. The 1.1.3 tarball looks fine with
> NetBSD's /bin/tar but the 1.1.4 throws lots of:
>
> tar: File extended headers posix ustar archive. Extracting as plain files. Following files might be in the wrong directory or have wrong attributes.
> ---------- 1 root wheel 27 Dec 31 1969 ././@PaxHeader
> drwxr-xr-x 2 502 staff 0 Dec 31 1969 sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml-1.1.4/sphinxcontrib/serializinghtml/locales/zh_TW
> tar: File extended headers posix ustar archive. Extracting as plain files. Following files might be in the wrong directory or have wrong attributes.
> ---------- 1 root wheel 28 Dec 31 1969 ././@PaxHeader
> drwxr-xr-x 2 502 staff 0 Dec 31 1969 sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml-1.1.4/sphinxcontrib/serializinghtml/locales/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES
> tar: File extended headers posix ustar archive. Extracting as plain files. Following files might be in the wrong directory or have wrong attributes.
> ---------- 1 root wheel 156 Dec 31 1969 ././@PaxHeader
> -rw-r--r-- 1 502 staff 755 Dec 31 1969 sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml-1.1.4/sphinxcontrib/serializinghtml/locales/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/sphinxco
> tar: File extended headers posix ustar archive. Extracting as plain files. Following files might be in the wrong directory or have wrong attributes.
> ---------- 1 root wheel 156 Dec 31 1969 ././@PaxHeader
> -rw-r--r-- 1 502 staff 1007 Dec 31 1969 sphinxcontrib-serializinghtml-1.1.4/sphinxcontrib/serializinghtml/locales/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/sphinxco
Have you seen the dates? It pre-dates the epoq? Is it supported? Because
this seems to imply that the date is negative (probably -1)...
--
Thierry Laronde <tlaronde +AT+ polynum +dot+ com>
http://www.kergis.com/
http://www.sbfa.fr/
Key fingerprint = 0FF7 E906 FBAF FE95 FD89 250D 52B1 AE95 6006 F40C
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index