Re: PATCH libatomic

To: n54%gmx.com@localhost (Kamil Rytarowski), christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas), tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: PATCH libatomic
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 03:05:38 +0200

Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> wrote:

> I have checked LLDB and std::atomic<uint64_t> is used on purpose and was
> switched from mutexes 3 years ago.

I guess that explains why so many packages now break on i386 because the
lack of 64 bit atomic operations. libreoffice and freeradius are that
last one I stumbled upon. I worked it around by a -march=i686, but
indeed it would be nice if it could just build.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: PATCH libatomic
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

Prev by Date: Re: PATCH libatomic
Next by Date: Re: getrandom and getentropy
Previous by Thread: Re: PATCH libatomic
Next by Thread: Re: PATCH libatomic
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index