Re: Libc support for old BSD-style "sigcontext" signal handlers is broken, let's just kill it.

To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Libc support for old BSD-style "sigcontext" signal handlers is broken, let's just kill it.
From: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 01:24:56 +0700

    Date:        Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:13:00 -0700
    From:        Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
    Message-ID:  <474C830E-74D0-4234-B186-FE92FF97B098%me.com@localhost>

  | I mean, I could certainly fix it

I think Christos already did.

kre

References:
- Re: Libc support for old BSD-style "sigcontext" signal handlers is broken, let's just kill it.
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: Libc support for old BSD-style "sigcontext" signal handlers is broken, let's just kill it.
  - From: Valery Ushakov
- Libc support for old BSD-style "sigcontext" signal handlers is broken, let's just kill it.
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: Libc support for old BSD-style "sigcontext" signal handlers is broken, let's just kill it.
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Re: Libc support for old BSD-style "sigcontext" signal handlers is broken, let's just kill it.
Next by Date: Re: Request for implementation of KERN_PROC_SIGTRAMP sysctl
Previous by Thread: Re: Libc support for old BSD-style "sigcontext" signal handlers is broken, let's just kill it.
Next by Thread: Re: Request for implementation of KERN_PROC_SIGTRAMP sysctl
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index