Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads

To: tech-userlevel%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 17:18:07 +0100

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:38:35PM +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> DNS queries (via UDP) are limited to max 512, as that is what the
> protocol always required, so can be handled by everything (or should be).

Strictly speaking, it is the minimum MTU every IPv4 implementation is
supposed to allow. IPv6 bumped it to 1280.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
  - From: Steffen Nurpmeso

References:
- Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
  - From: Mouse
- Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
  - From: Anthony Mallet
- Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
  - From: Robert Elz

Prev by Date: Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
Next by Date: Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
Previous by Thread: Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
Next by Thread: Re: stack overflow in getaddrinfo(3) with a small-sized stack in pthreads
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index