tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: mount(8) enhancement
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2023 12:08:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
Message-ID: <202304011608.MAA07138%Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
| I would much prefer to use the existing mechanisms to specify
| filesystem-specific parameters more generally
I agree. The proposal looks like an exceedingly ugly way to proceed.
Further, if the objective for having "one of [$%@:&]" is to allow mount(8)
(as distinct from mount_xxx) to guess which "xxx" to use to run mount_xxx
then just NO. Apart from anything else, why 5 special chars, what happened
to # ^ ! { } | ...? But even if everything non alpha-numeric was made
special, that would still never be enough for future potential needs.
Keep the -t to specify xxx and use it, and once you've made that decision,
adding a suitable -o (whatever xxx needs) is no issue at all.
kre
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index