Re: Trivial program size inflation

[mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)]

mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost (Mouse) writes:

>> Way more interesting than useless tech demo sizes would size
>> inflation of a real world minimal program, when linked statically.

>Why?  If I'm looking at overhead size, I am most interested in just the
>overhead size, which is exactly what a no-op program gives.

For a no-op program it's overhead, but for a real world minimal program
probably not, because it actually requires that code.