tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: epoll exposure

To: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%me.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: epoll exposure
From: nia <nia%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2023 06:07:54 +0000

On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 07:18:38PM -0700, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> Anyway, like I said, I think the best way forward is to make it possible for kq descriptors to be inherited… it’s a little tricky because of some of the wacky stuff kqueue can track, but I think NetBSD can lead on this and define a set of semantics that makes sense.

Can we agree on renaming the header to sys/epoll_compat.h?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: epoll exposure
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- epoll exposure
  - From: nia
- Re: epoll exposure
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: epoll exposure
  - From: nia
- Re: epoll exposure
  - From: Tobias Nygren
- Re: epoll exposure
  - From: Rin Okuyama
- Re: epoll exposure
  - From: Theodore Preduta
- Re: epoll exposure
  - From: Jason Thorpe

Prev by Date: Re: epoll exposure
Next by Date: Re: /etc/services losses
Previous by Thread: Re: epoll exposure
Next by Thread: Re: epoll exposure
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index