Re: failures with NetBSD

[Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>]

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 06:43:51PM +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote:
> before the conversion to ATF).  I guess I really have to add an  
> "Expected failure" output for test cases (it's in the to-do list for  
> 0.6), so that we can clearly mark those that we know are broken and  
> thus prevent confusion to end users.

I think "expected failure" is confusing - maybe add a "known to fail"
result and allow outputing some helpfull comment (like "PR bin/xxxxx")?

Martin