Re: -Werror=unused-but-set-variable

[Julio Merino <jmmv%julipedia.org@localhost>]

On 8/10/11 6:43 PM, Emmanuel Fleury wrote:
> In fact, I assumed that the check for unused-variable was induced by the
> -Wall and could be deactivated through a call to -Wno-unused. But, I'm
> not sure that having explicitly both -Wno-unused and -Wunused in the
> same command line will help a lot.

Aha.  Actually, this should have worked on your side because the code is 
currently using -Wall first and later -Wno-unused-parameters to silence 
this part of -Wall.  Might this be a bug in gcc 4.6?

Could you paste a single gcc execution line from the build log to see in 
what order the -W flags are being passed to the compiler?

Thanks.