Subject: Re: Formal getty replacement yet?
To: J.T. Conklin <jconklin@netcom.com>
From: Martin Husemann <martin@euterpe.owl.de>
List: current-users
Date: 12/20/1994 18:24:16 
> I didn't think changing NetBSD's getty into some sort of "uugetty" was
> even under consideration.

Anybody who needs a kind of "uugetty" now: ask archie for mgetty.
Newer versions compile and work out of the box on NetBSD-1.0 and -current.


Martin