Subject: stty extensions?
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Niklas Hallqvist <niklas@appli.se>
List: current-users
Date: 01/29/1995 02:49:48
I have for quite some time had all my serial drivers paying special
attention when they were opened with the O_TRUNC flag in which case I
did a ttstart in order to handle XOFFs without XONs (e.g. line noise can
make this happen) and bugs in general handshaking, leaving ttys in
stopped state. Only just recently I rediscovered the TIOC{START,STOP}
ioctls which I had forgot all about since the first time I read a
tty(4) man page. Great, I thought, what user-level commands
implements this interface on ttys then? I grepped the whole tree only
to find that no program did this. So I implemented them in stty(1).
The only thing that bothers me is that stty deals with modes and not
events. But in order to keep related things close to each other I put
them in stty anyway.
What I wonder is:
+ Is there any interest at all having the extra TIOC* ioctls of
tty(4) easily done by a system-supplied user-level command?
+ Should that command by stty(1)? Creeping featuritis...
+ Today, I only implemented the START/STOP ioctls. I call the
stty options "ostart" and "ostop" respectively. The mnemonic
`o' stands for "output". If stty is the place for this
functionality, are these names well chosen?
+ Does anybody want my small stty patch?
Niklas
Niklas Hallqvist Phone: +46-(0)31-40 75 00
Applitron Datasystem Fax: +46-(0)31-83 39 50
Molndalsvagen 95 Email: niklas@appli.se
S-412 63 GOTEBORG WWW: Here
Sweden