Subject: Re: Sync vs. Async file system
To: Per Fogelstrom <pefo@enea.se>
From: Per Fogelstrom <pefo@enea.se>
List: current-users
Date: 09/30/1995 20:48:57
hrm.. sorry I switched sync and async. I also tried it at
an mfs to hide disk latency.
create delete
Type Size N /sec /sec
--------------------------------------
mfs 0k 500 625 2778
1k 500 450 1020
4k 500 314 100
10k 500 219 962
>
> Hi!
>
> There was some talk about filesystem speed some time ago.
> I ran a benchmark that was posted to the net a while ago to
> see what the difference between async and sync mounting was.
>
> The test creates writes and deletes a number of files with
> different size.
>
> This was the result:
>
> create delete
> Type Size N /sec /sec
> --------------------------------------
> Sync 0k 500 84 2778
> 1k 500 48 90
> 4k 500 45 90
> 10k 500 32 90
>
> Async 0k 500 34 90
> 1k 500 26 35
> 4k 500 26 35
> 10k 500 20 29
>
> I'm not making any conclusions, this is only an observation.
>
> Per
>