Subject: Re: umount question, RFE
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Guenther Grau <s_grau@ira.uka.de>
List: current-users
Date: 12/15/1995 19:51:10
Hi greywolf,

[...]
> However, it does not seem so reasonable in the case of umount, as one
> would probably not want to try to unmount a filesystem which is not
> listed as already mounted.  Umount should look at the current mount
> table when trying to unmount filesystems so that one can simply type
> "umount -avt nfs" when wishing to umount filesystems left over from
> a dead automounter, or when wishing to umount possibly duplicate
> filesystems.
> 
> Do I make sense, or Am I Mis(well, you've seen it often enough :-)?

Well, I am not the one to decide if your words make sense or not. I can
only say, that your words made sense to me :-) Or to put it in other
words: I strongly support this request. I expect this behaviour from
umount and think that our umount behave a little bit strange. umount -a
should unmount everything that's mounted, not only what's in fstab.

  Guenther

P.S.: Why is your real name always different when you send email? 

> From: greywolf@defender.VAS.viewlogic.com (Computo Ergo Checksum)