>>Unless i'm mistaken, FreeBSD did something not _too_ dissimilar to
>>this, though i've not looked at their code in a Long Time.
>
>Yep, I'm gonna look at doing Just That.  :)
>
>In truth, I'd like to add the support FreeBSD has for lkm's into
>NetBSD.  The method they use doesn't seem to be that bad, at least at
>first glance.

   Actually, the LKM method we're currently using will likely change in the
future - using an external linker/loader while on the surface may seem like a
good idea, it's in practice very inflexible.

-DG