Subject: Re: Memory leak?
To: Peter Seebach <seebs@solon.com>
From: Rob Windsor <windsor@punk.hedgehog.com>
List: current-users
Date: 02/05/1996 01:27:39
Verily did Peter Seebach write:
> It's reasonably visible in low-memory systems. I think someone explained
> that the rule was something like "if a process which is partially paged
> out exits and the parent process is also at least partially paged out,
> the child process's pages are not reclaimed". It was arcane.
> Our system used to crash or need a reboot about every 3 days, with 8 megs
> of memory, and comfortably goes for 2 weeks, with 16. Symptom: swap
> space runs out.
Hmm, I don't see a "leak", but more of a "liberal use of virtual mem"
on one of my systems. i386, mailhost, dns server, router, 8M real mem,
64M swap, 32M /tmp (mfs, only 3k in use), not much in user-processes
running (just shells and a couple of irc processes).
Swap on this machine is currently idling at 71%, with an uptime of
37 days (longer than ftp.netbsd.org, I might add. Hi Bill :). I'd guess
that that if something was "leaking", then it's quite slow, and I couldn't
begin to put a finger on which app/area it is.
-- Rob
----------------------------------------
Internet: windsor@pobox.com Life: Rob@Sunnyvale.California.USA.Earth
"Da Web": http://pobox.com/~windsor/
"Ain't much distance 'tween a pat on the back and a kick in the pants."
-- David Lee Roth (1990), `The Dogtown Shuffle'