Subject: Re: Stupid printer question
To: Ron Roskens <roskens@cs.umn.edu>
From: Jukka Marin <jmarin@pyy.jmp.fi>
List: current-users
Date: 09/22/1996 20:13:43
> You should setup your "filter" as the input filter.
>
> lp:\
> :sd=/var/spool/lpd:lf=/var/spool/lpd/logfile:\
> :if=/path/to/input/filter:
If I use something like
lp:\
:lp=:rm=remote.machine:rp=printerqueue:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd:\
:lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:\
:if=/usr/local/bin/pfilt:\
:mx#0:sf:sh:rs:
it seems that the data isn't going through pfilt at all (pfilt doesn't
get run) but sent to the remote printer as-is. Is this a bug or a
feature? I think it's either a bug or I'm doing something stupid.
Besides, if you have a comment in /etc/printcap ending with backslash,
it seems to confuse lpr/lprm/lpq. This _is_ a bug, isn't it? ;)
-jm
--
---> http://www.jmp.fi/~jmarin/ <---