Subject: Re: weakness in linker? or just normal?
To: VaX#n8 <vax@linkdead.paranoia.com>
From: Julian Bean <jules@mailbox.co.uk>
List: current-users
Date: 09/27/1996 10:25:38
At 9:59 pm 26/9/96, VaX#n8 wrote:
>Is having to specify "-ltermcap" to catch unresolved symbols in "-lcurses"
>a feature or bug? With my limited understanding of linking semantics,
>I'd venture to say it was a feature since you could use symbols from
>whatever lib you wanted to fill in the -lcurses Undefined ones.
>However, I've been wrong before.
It is normal.
I asked the same question earlier this week (in the context of shared
libraries). You may be right, it may be a feature.
It is irritating in some ways, as it makes it harder to make cross-platform
makefiles (Other systems only need -lcurses or -lncurses, we need -ltermcap
as well)....
It would be nice to have a Solaris-style shared lib dependancy system, but
I suspect it would be a lot of work...
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@mailbox.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Road |
| Jules aka | | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| The 'net interprets censorship as damage, and routes around it. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/