> > That's reasonable enough.  I was starting to think about that, too,
> > and was considering a comand line flag, but then Terry Moore sent me
> > a version he did that does the locking only if called as `uugetty'
> > rather than `getty.'  What do you think of this?
> 
> Personally?  I don't like things that mutate based on argv[0].

Haven't looked at at/atq/atrm/batch or chsh/chfn/chpass or.... ?  :-)

  -jm

-- 

                     ---> http://www.jmp.fi/~jmarin/ <---