On Thu Jan  9 02:32:00 1997, Christoph Badura wrote:
> 
> netbsd@arresum.INka.DE (Bernd Ernesti) writes:
> >>     Same for MAKEDEV. So wouldn't it
> >>     be usefull to reserve some numbers for attapi, or will it be never
> >>     included to the official tree some day?
> 
> >The atapi source are unoffical changes so we can't really care about the
> >device number for every unoffical driver.
> 
> What a load of nonsense.  You either have to start a registry for

Where the hell should I know about other device numbers if I DON"T
USE IT and the driver is NOT in our -current tree and nobody mentioned
the device numbers on current-users?

Bernd