Subject: Re: loading lkm's
To: Matthias Drochner <drochner@zelux6.zel.kfa-juelich.de>
From: Paul Goyette <paul@pgoyette.bdt.com>
List: current-users
Date: 03/17/1997 13:10:53
On Mon, 17 Mar 1997, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> There are a lot of problems with lkm's in general and loadable
> device drivers in particular which make me consider this
> usable for people who "know what they are doing" only.
> What comes to mind:
> -The kernel lacks modularity at some places, there are
> "#ifdef"s scattered in the code which prevent lkm's from
> working. (example: union fs)
Well, if you really want them, I've got changes that remove the need for
#ifdef UNIONFS - they've been submittd as PR#kern/2950 but no word on
whether or not they'll ever be integrated.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Paul Goyette | PGP Public Key fingerprint: | E-mail addresses: |
| Network Consultant | 0E 40 D2 FC 2A 13 74 A0 | paul@pgoyette.bdt.com |
| and kernel hacker | E4 69 D5 BE 65 E4 56 C6 | paul_goyette@ins.com |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------