Subject: lack of OCRNL in termios
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
List: current-users
Date: 04/01/1997 15:22:30
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


  Is this lack unintentional, or is use of the OCRNL flag with
termio*s* wrong? (Not posix)
  I'm trying to build GNU texinfo.
  I would propose:

*** /usr/include/termios.h      Wed Apr 10 07:38:17 1996
- --- /usr/src/sys/sys/termios.h     Tue Apr  1 15:16:14 1997
***************
*** 112,117 ****
- --- 112,118 ----
  #define ONLCR         0x00000002      /* map NL to CR-NL (ala CRMOD) */
  #define OXTABS                0x00000004      /* expand tabs to spaces */
  #define ONOEOT                0x00000008      /* discard EOT's (^D) on output) */
+ #define OCRNL           0x00000000      /* not available */
  #endif  /*_POSIX_SOURCE */

   
  The usage in texinfo-3.9/info/terminal.c is to want to turn that
option off.
  What do you think?

   :!mcr!:            |  Network security consulting and 
   Michael Richardson |      contract programming
 WWW: mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca. PGP key available.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQB1AwUBM0FuNKZpLyXYhL+BAQFt3QL/WrckHA1ScGrLW43Rp7ZHkeTVy7G9QHqe
8ckFNzz7bgH6Hm/FyuPJiw6edR98xVSjOh0oN21dIVoq803PF4h0OtDak6xGIY8O
QFULLBv+RiunMsdVM5sH2X+DI4M0F27h
=9t+/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----