Subject: Re: long long vs. -ansi...
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: None <is@Beverly.Rhein.DE>
List: current-users
Date: 04/16/1997 10:14:23
Andrew Reilly (andrew@zeta.org.au) wrote:
: On Thu, Apr 10, 1997 at 09:56:17AM +0000, is@Beverly.Rhein.DE wrote:
: > Andrew Reilly (andrew@zeta.org.au) wrote:
: > : > 64-bit integers as a native type.
: > : 
: > : I would suggest that a struct {unsigned long; long;} would
: > 
: > May I point out that you are thinking little-endian?
: 
: It's true, I was at the time, but my understanding was that
: this would have to be in an architecture-dependant file
: anyway, because some archs would just use "long" where long
: was 64 bits.  Of course on big endian machines you'd do

oh... of course.

: 
: 	struct {long; unsigned long};

Regards,
	-is