> Ahem... Better when it produces correct code and it does not always.

If you're making the claim that Sun's SPARC compiler always produces
correct code, you're a pretty adventurous person.

> I am fine with that if it will buy us something... I am not convinced that
> using __P is such a difficult thing.

If that is the only ANSIsm we're talking about, then I'd have to
agree.   Is that in fact true?

			       _MelloN_