Subject: Re: pkg_* tools and doc (was Re: new i386 snapshot uploaded)
To: David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: current-users
Date: 09/03/1997 13:13:02
On Wed, 3 Sep 1997 12:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
David Brownlee <abs@anim.dreamworks.com> wrote:
> Its a convenient, (in availability and for coding) language.
> I can see not wanting to need perl for reading docs, but for
> generating it seems reasonable... Modulus any licence issues
> maybe?
Well...
There's a sort of versionitis problem w/ perl. But I guess everyone
uses perl5 these days.
Dunno, even though I like perl (and used to do a LOT of coding in perl
at a previous job), part of me wants to shudder at the thought of putting
it in the tree :-)
Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center Home: +1 408 866 1912
NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: +1 415 604 0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: +1 415 428 6939