Subject: Re: sh backtick deficiency?
To: John F. Woods <jfw@jfwhome.funhouse.com>
From: Andrew Brown <twofsonet@graffiti.com>
List: current-users
Date: 04/02/1998 11:59:42
>The shell has *always* expanded backtick text into separate arguments, and
>it better keep doing so. I just verified that it did so on 7th Edition UNIX
>thanks to the PDP11 simulator mentioned on this list a while back; I'd have
>verified it for V6, but V6 didn't have sed, my favorite test case.
>
>Consider the common data-reduction case of having a bunch of files, some of
>which you want to hand to a program based on whether they contain a string:
>
>$ grep string2 `grep string1 f? | sed -e 's/:.*//'`
how about
$ grep string2 `grep -h string1 f?`
rtfm, eh? now does it work on v6? hmm?? :)
--
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org * "ah! i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown) that goes *ping*!"
warfare@graffiti.com * "information is power -- share the wealth."