> And what do you propose we should do about problematic licenses,
> routinely violate them?  Let each individual developer's ideas of what
> the licenses mean rule inclusion into the tree?  I don't see any
> reasonable solution *but* discussion of the issue.

Really, problematic licenses are something that the NetBSD lawyer
should look at and decide upon based on a fixed set of criteria that
we give her.   None of us are lawyers.   We know what we want out of a
license.   There's really no need for further discussion on the topic
- it just raises people's hackles.

			       _MelloN_