Subject: Re: scsi-disks hardsectored to 1024 byte/sec
To: None <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Guenther Grau <Guenther.Grau@bk.bosch.de>
List: current-users
Date: 07/16/1998 15:44:26
Hi Leo,
Leo Weppelman wrote:
[...]
> I'll look for it. Here at work, in my clipboard was the following piece of
> Bonnie data (Note that this was on a 300Mb old MAXTOR, I had one on 1024 and
> one on 512 byte sector size in my system at that time):
>
> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random--
> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks---
> Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU
> 100-1K 100 384 60.0 380 11.6 290 13.6 509 99.3 994 23.7 30.0 9.0
>
> 100-512 100 583 99.0 1110 63.3 559 47.3 508 99.3 1005 46.6 31.5 8.8
>
> 100-512O 100 583 99.1 1114 64.4 558 50.1 508 99.4 1005 46.6 31.6 8.9
How come that the 1K-sector is so much slower on output, but about
the same on input???
Guenther