Jim Bernard writes:
> On 9 22, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > The way that info works, it would be trivial to point the top level
> > info file in /usr/share/info at a "second level" top level file in
> > /usr/pkg/info. It would be a single line added. Simple, clean.
> 
>   And completely unnecessary: info combines the contents of dir files found
> in its search path (which is rather extensive and already includes
> /usr/share/info and /usr/pkg/info).

So then what is the issue? Why can't we just install everything in the 
tree into /usr/share/info and be done?

Perry