Subject: Re: Amanda backups: gtar or dump?
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Michael C. Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
List: current-users
Date: 10/28/1998 22:29:01
>>>>> "Greg" == Greg A Woods <woods@most.weird.com> writes:
Greg> Well, if all you want to do is ensure the data can be read successfully
Greg> off the tape then dd is sufficient for testing, and can be faster.
I disagree. I did use dd last time. It fails to identify the case that
the dump ran out of tape, and just aborted rather than notice this case.
:!mcr!: | Network and security consulting/contract programming
Michael Richardson | Firewalls, TCP/IP and Unix administration
Personal: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/People/Michael_Richardson/Bio.html
Corporate: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/SSW/
ON HUMILITY: To err is human, to moo bovine.