Please excuse this mail being posted here.  I'm sorry and meant to
have posted it on developers, really.  It was because Luke mentioned
flaming CODA that I lost my orientation.

"Robert V. Baron" <rvb@cs.cmu.edu> writes:

> OK, lets go back to Coda for a bit.  It seems based on Chris's survey
> that we want to leave Coda around in some form.  I'll reconsider
> making Coda only an lkm when that technology matures, but not right
> now.  (NOTE: right now Coda is sys/lkm/vfs.)
> 
> So the question is what to do with the app (client/server) layer.
> Coda is already a package in the pkgsrc tree.  I'd like to leave
> coda_server/coda_client as the old pre GPL version.  This way folk
> from the BSD communities can work on it if that makes sense.  I'd
> also like to introduce the GPL'd Coda 5.0 version under package
> names coda5_server/coda5_client.  I'll probably commit this at
> the end of the week if there are no major issues.
> 
> I'm not sure what to do about shadow integration of the Coda
> sources.  Is this still an interesting/valuable option?