Subject: Re: Netatalk and localtalk conectivity?
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: Aaron J. Grier <agrier@poofy.goof.com>
List: current-users
Date: 02/08/1999 16:45:36
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 02:36:49PM -0800, Jonathan Stone wrote:
> Actually, the best-suited hardware of all may be the DECstation 5000
> series (except 200) and the Alpha 3000 series with the ioctl asic.
> The ioasic has a DMA engine that can pump out an entire packet (up to
> 4kbytes, aligned to end-of-page) with only one interrupt. Same deal
> with reception, tho' the driver may have to poll to find end-of-packet.
So serial on the 5000/2{4,6}0 is actually decent?
> The intersection of people who have the dec hardware, Mac hardware,
> and interest in localtalk maybe empty, tho'.
Reed College used to be such a place. They were originally a big mac
school, along with a lot of DEC hardware running the actual services.
They gave away all of it a couple years ago. (I scored a 5000/200 from
the deal, and the {2,3}100s have all found good homes...)
But anyway... the original user wanted to hack localtalk so he could
spew at his laserwriter+ faster than 9600bps. It seems a moot point
since that printer certainly takes longer to render postscript than it
does to suck it down. (I used to use one at Reed.) It's a slow
printer, no matter how fast you can throw the bits at it.
It would still be a cool hack, though it's probably best left to
machines with the actual hardware designed to deal with such a busted
networking implementation. (IE, macs.)
----
Aaron J. Grier | "Not your ordinary poofy goof." | agrier@poofy.goof.com
"NT is mute because it is fundamentally broken, period. That any
hardware works on that OS is amazing."
-- Jacob Hawley, Sr. Manager, Custom Engineering, Creative Labs