Subject: Re: RAIDFRAME questions
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Dave Barr <barr@visi.com>
List: current-users
Date: 01/04/2000 15:26:31
Markus Kilbinger wrote:
> Does the '/dev/sd{1,2}a is not clean!' mean real harm, or is it just
> cosmetic? Especially in the first case how to fix it?
It's real harm, in the sense that the RAID parity checksums
are now inconsistent, and you're not operating redundantly anymore.
> Another question: With the mounted /dev/raid0d 'raidctl -s raid0' just
> says:
>
> raidctl: unable to open device file: /dev/raid0d
>
> -> Are all these control and reconstruct raidctl commands only
> available for unmounted raid devices??
It appears so. I once edited /etc/rc like this:
# Configure raid devices.
for dev in 0 1 2 3; do
if [ -f /etc/raid$dev.conf ]; then
raidctl -c /etc/raid$dev.conf raid$dev
raidctl -P /etc/raid$dev.conf raid$dev
fi
done
Except that the parity reconstruct, at least on my 4x1GB on an SS5,
took something on the order of an hour to complete.
It seems there should be a way for the parity checking to be
done in the background.
--Dave