>: >The reason I say you've mis-interpreted that particular web page is
>: >because it in no way indicates that a C compiler is a legacy feature of
>: >the standard -- what's marked as a "legacy" tool is "cc", aka K&R C, or
>: >as the page you can link to from there says "The cc utility is an
>: >interface to an unspecified C-language compilation system."  If you look
>: >up c89 in the same standard you'll find it is *not* a legacy tool!
>: 
>: i've never met a c89 anywhere.
>
>See NetBSD 1.4.x or higher, /usr/bin/c89.

wow...gee.  um...what do i do with it?  oh, i see.  cc -ansi.  right.
will there be a c99 any time soon?

>In any case, *NetBSD* won't be dropping its (outsourced) C compiler anytime
>in the foreseeable future.

good to know.  :)

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
andrew@crossbar.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."