>
>We should probably do something a little more uniform here, by creating sup
>collections that follow the release branches explicitly.  "current" would
>then _always_ follow -current, and we would have "release-1-5",
>"release-1-6", etc.

That sounds a lot more sane. Sup reverting from -current to the release tree
around release time (and then staying that way for almost 6 months in the
last case) makes it next to impossible to use sup for tracking -current 
easily.

I've actually gone to anoncvs for some stuff since I've found it easier but
with faster drives keeping local CVS tree's is so much easier to deal with
if you sup things down and import/update from them.

James