Subject: USB mass storage really slow?
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: John F. Woods <jfw@jfwhome.funhouse.com>
List: current-users
Date: 01/29/2001 20:04:50
I just copied a bunch of files off of a USB Zip drive. It took
1051.35 seconds (17.5 minutes) to copy about 92MB. I know USB isn't
terribly fast, but a Mac is able to copy an entire Zip disk (over USB)
in about 2.5 minutes. (The particulars of the NetBSD system in
question: NetBSD 1.5, 350MHz Pentium ][, 64MB RAM, pretty much idle
during the copy other than handling PPP routing.)
Is there a particular reason why it was this slow, or is this a can of
worms waiting to be opened?
While I'm complaining here, I observed a very curious bit of
misbehavior: the fictitious disklabel crafted for a Zip cartridge
isn't consistent. For one of two Zip cartridges, I got partitions
d: 196608 0 unused
h: 196576 32 MSDOS
but the other came up with
d: 196608 0 unused
e: 194528 32 MSDOS
What determines which partition it uses, and why are the sizes
different? The two cartridges were formatted on the same (Windows)
system, I think. (Considering that the contents of these two
cartridges are the -current sources, I suppose I ought to just go look
up the answer myself...)