Subject: Re: USB 2.0 for the brave
To: None <rmk@rmkhome.com>
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>
List: current-users
Date: 11/22/2001 14:36:17
--RMedoP2+Pr6Rq0N2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 02:07:41AM -0700, Rick Kelly wrote:
> It would be interesting to cluster machines together over firewire or
> USB 2.0 using their full bandwidth.
Hrm. GigE beats out USB 2.0 hands down, and we already support it.
I'm not convinced that going through the TCP/IP stack is actually
more overhead than going through our (as yet uncompleted) USB 2.0
driver.
Firewire host-to-host adapters would rock, though. Probably worth
taking a look at what the PAPERS cluster did, if this interests you.
(Not using firewire, obviously, but a similar use of a
high-bandwidth bus to connect hosts.)
--=20
~ g r @ eclipsed.net
--RMedoP2+Pr6Rq0N2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (NetBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjv9U7EACgkQ9ehacAz5CRo2TwCfWoeL0Wd3cKqLdcFpruOzI0+7
qhAAn2heO6JuKWk0jTGX9xCrtjtZhpNk
=huxb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--RMedoP2+Pr6Rq0N2--