> 
> [if it looks and works more like ksh I swear I'm going to lose it, without
>  going into reasons again as to why ksh is not ever going to be my preferred
>  shell, let alone ksh scripts should be burnt.]

If it's not too much to ask, which particular ksh feature do you detest
so much - that isn't required by a sh that conforms to the 'modern'
standards?


	David

-- 
David Laight: david@l8s.co.uk