Subject: Re: Status of NEW_BUFQ_STRATEGY?
To: None <kilbi@rad.rwth-aachen.de>
From: enami tsugutomo <enami@sm.sony.co.jp>
List: current-users
Date: 11/01/2002 15:15:45
Markus W Kilbinger <kilbi@rad.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
> >>>>> "enami" == enami tsugutomo <enami@sm.sony.co.jp> writes:
>
> enami> Urban Boquist <urban@boquist.net> writes:
> >> --- trap (number 6) ---
> >> bufq_prio_get(c07a689c,1,c0420bf0,c02332e6) at bufq_prio_get+0x5b
>
> enami> Is this repeatable? I have two machine with this option
> enami> enabled but it runs without panic (both uses wd).
>
> It panic's my i386 (dual athlon, wd) and my tibook (macppc, wd), too.
Hmm, and you both don't have options QUEUEDEBUG in your kernel config,
right (if it has, it panics)?
enami.