In message <20030904083042.GK5506@nef.pbox.org>
	on Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:30:42 +0200,
	Alistair Crooks <agc@wasabisystems.com> wrote:
> > How about introduce MKPKGINSTALL to prevent install pkg_install
> > related command build and install on base system?
> > 
> > (Of course, MKPKGINSTALL is instantly made name.)
> 
> We update the versions of pkg_install on the branches when we're
> assured that they're stable.  Due to some recent changes, I personally
> am taking a conservative view on this, but rest assured that a pullup
> will definitely be requested for pkg_install so that the new
> functionality will be sync-ed up to the release branches.
Hmmm, I should control myself.

> I'm against a MKPKGINSTALL variable, or anything that makes things
> easier to leave systems in an inconsistent state.
I see that's the right reason.

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca@back-street.net>