Subject: Re: BSD auth for NetBSD
To: Nate Hill <vugdeox@freeshell.org>
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls@rek.tjls.com>
List: current-users
Date: 09/08/2003 21:48:00
On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 01:42:43AM +0000, Nate Hill wrote:
> On Mon September 8 2003 21:38, Noriyuki Soda wrote:
> > >>>>> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 06:15:27 +0900 (JST),
> >
> > itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino) said:
> > > as a firm believer of "rough consensus and running code"
> >
> > Well, I don't see that there is rough consensus to import BSD auth
> > as the basic layer of authentication, because many people pointed
> > out that BSD auth can be implemented over PAM, and PAM can never be
> > implemented over BSD auth, and also people who agreed with BSD auth
> > couldn't produce any counterevidence.
>
> I beleive there is rough consensus that you're extremely biased, have
> never once considered, commented on, or even recognized any
> compromises; and have very little (nothing new either) evidence
> supporting your crusade.
[...]
> It's called collaberative development for a reason.
Your comments are extremely rude and entirely uncalled-for. Soda-san
has made many important contributions to NetBSD in his long tenure as
a developer. He is entitled to his opinion, which many of the NetBSD
developers happen to share. He also stated that opinion concisely and
politely -- in dramatic contrast to your long, choleric rant.
Collaborative development, eh? What have you done for me lately?