>| >>- does darwin_sysctl() need to be gc'ed?
>| >
>| >no.  darwin emulation needs its own syscall entry point.
>| 
>| er...make that "yes, it does need to bs gc'ed".  i momentarily
>| confused darwin_sysctl() with darwin_sys___sysctl().
>
>I was scratching my head about that.

darwin_sys___sysctl() is the darwin version of sys___sysctl().

darwin_sysctl() is (or was, rather) the sysctl function to handle the
native emul.darwin subtree, which is now gone.  the function, that is,
not the subtree.  the subtree is still there, but the implementation
is different.  :)

but you knew all that...

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
werdna@squooshy.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."