Subject: Re: Poll: NON BurnFree (buffer underrun protection) CD writers
To: None <current-users@netbsd.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: current-users
Date: 03/27/2004 10:03:37
--wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:47:46PM +0100, Reinoud Zandijk wrote:
> as some might have notived, i am writing a filingsystem for CDs and DVDs
> but am wondering about the presence of NON buffer underrun protected
> CD-R(W) burners still in active use today.
>=20
> Not supporting those drives would significantly simplify my implementatio=
n=20
> and thus am looking forward to skip them :-)
>=20
> Any ideas on the subject ?

There are probably a number still in use, but they can be used with
cdrecord.

It doesn't seem a bad restriction for a direct r/w fs, and certainly
not in the initial stages..

--
Dan.

--wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFAZLbJEAVxvV4N66cRAhbgAJ4+cjll2MZSskJkn371NXtYCY3w9wCePnPc
rSvUWaUaiNv6htybEOxt3JA=
=vjOa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--wxDdMuZNg1r63Hyj--