On Sat, 1 May 2004, George Michaelson wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 18:05:01 +0200 Michael Rauch <mrauch@NetBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> >Hi, 

Exactly the same here... slightly earlier kernel. The native one seems to
be working fine, though (with TMP=/tmp). 

> >
> >On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 09:52:27PM +1000, George Michaelson wrote:
> >> linux emulated OpenOffice 1.1.1, with java.
> >> 
> >> the setup/install combination coredumps with some issue in glibc.
> >
> >Do you have the exact message?
> + ./setup -v -nogui -r:/tmp/./install.27705a
> glibc version: 2.2.4
> ./install: line 139:  2066 Floating point exception(core dumped) ./setup -v -nogui -r:${TMPFILE}
> + echo ' '
>  
> + echo 'Installation Completed'
> Installation Completed
> 
> 
> 
> >Btw, if it's just
> >glibc: 2.2.4 
> >that's normal and fine. There's a check at the beginning that the glibc
> >version is new enough, and it always prints the found version number as a
> >diagnostic message.
> 
> ok. its after that.
> 
> >There might also be a log file in
> >/usr/pkg/OpenOffice.org1.1.1/program/setup.log. Does it contain any
> >interesting lines?
> 
> no file. :-(
> 
> but there is /tmp/sv001.tmp/ which has:
> 
> # ls -ltr
> total 3302
> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel    30632 Mar 31  2003 libgcc_s.so.1
> -rwxrwxr-x  1 root  wheel   779528 Dec  1 15:47 libstlport_gcc.so
> -rwxrwxr-x  1 root  wheel  1797144 Jan 30 21:23 libsal.so.3.1.0
> -rw-------  1 root  wheel   737280 May  1 14:37 setup.core
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel       30 May  1 14:37 libsal.so.3 -> /tmp/sv001.tmp/libsal.so.3.1.0
> #
> 
> >
> >> but, if I copy the /usr/pkg/OpenOffice.org1.1.1/ and /var/db/pkg/openoffice-linux/
> >> state into my machine, they run fine.
> >> 
> >> bizarre. any ideas? I think I found some issue with the suse_libc5 package
> >> before but my search of email in NetBSD archives wasn't conclusive.
> >
> >How current is your -current? Looking at commit messages, there have been
> >some problems during the statvfs->statfs transition, the last fix is from
> >April 27.
> 
> I did kernel at the same time as a full user install:
> 
> # uname -a 
> NetBSD dhcppc1 2.0E NetBSD 2.0E (GENERIC_LAPTOP) #4: Fri Apr 30 20:12:16 EST 2004  root@dhcppc1:/data/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC_LAPTOP i386
> #
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >The suse_libc5 issue was that in the days of version 1.0.3 some people
> >claimed they couldn't install the package unless the suse_libc5 package was
> >installed as well. I never could reproduce the problem on my computer, nor
> >to my knowledge has anyone found the cause for this.
> 
> Me neither (thats what I found in the email thread) but I also found problems
> when libc5 WAS installed at one point.
> 
> cheers
> 	-George
>