On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 08:19:48PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> 
> bouyer@antioche.eu.org said:
> > You shouldn't have used c: in the first place. 
> 
> I have to admit that I didn't follow the thread before.
> 
> But anyway, is there still a technical reason to enforce
> a special handling of c: (on i386, where d is RAW_PART)?
> A while ago I did scan the sources foe uses of it and
> I believe I didn't find any.

The disklabel is at the beginning of c:, not d:. This may be enouth to make
sure that c: is the NetBSD partition of the disk.

-- 
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.eu.org>
     NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
--