Subject: Re: PAM enabled on head
To: Quentin Garnier <cube@cubidou.net>
From: Arto Huusko <arto.huusko@utu.fi>
List: current-users
Date: 03/08/2005 17:18:32
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> Speaking of which, there is an issue for people like me who compile with
> MKKERBEROS=no. That way, pam_krb5.so is not built, but yet it is referenced
Have the set lists been fixed for MKKERBEROS=no case? When PAM
was initally commited, I did a build with MKKERBEROS=no, but the
set lists still referenced pam krb modules. IIRC, I haven't seen
a commit to fix this.
> by the pam configuration files. Hence after the installation of such a
> system, I can't login.
Uh-oh, that's way worse than mere set list lossage.