Subject: Re: is this refclock_palisade.c patch (PR#29685) ok to commit?
To: Christos Zoulas <christos@tac.gw.com>
From: Jeff Rizzo <riz@NetBSD.org>
List: current-users
Date: 05/20/2005 16:27:46
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 04:56:59PM -0400, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <20050520204449.GA27107@boogers.sf.ca.us>,
> Jeff Rizzo <riz@netbsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >PR#29685 from Brian Buhrow describes an issue with
> >dist/ntp/ntpd/refclock_palisade.c confusing microseconds and
> >nanoseconds, and offers the patch below to correct it.
> >
> >Is this OK to commit?
>=20
> Is this fixed in the ntp-current tree?
Yes, it is; the PR submitter submitted it to the ntp.org folks some
time ago, and it appears in the latest dev snapshot that I just downloaded.
+j
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
iQCVAwUBQo5ycrOuUtxCgar5AQLzMgQAlBW/nk4M/bjBZh1E7/FiUCWZCV9raJOh
Z1W9g90qL8vhzIc6lWvGoYQJcHhiMEy7h1CrHSz0frIGM0OJyUao/Eh8Z8ztJeuH
WiWt9ccI5mQGDRtqIA/gMeVJh4u6jwTx7JO8psbOAGA6LUHSG4BhLgI5YoS+T1Tc
QcIi+CE9nks=
=ATOs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH--