You're welcome claudio ... :D

I understand why you want GCC4 ... But right now, i haven't succeed =20
to build a "valid" distribution ( 3.99.21 / GCC4 ) without using GCC =20
3.3.6 ( latest version before the 'switch' to gcc4 )

The only workarround I've found is to first build release with =20
HAVE_GCC=3D3, then install this release to another HDD =20
( temporaly ) ... And build again but using HAVE_GCC=3D4 ...

This works for me ...

I think that if you really want a fully functionnal "gcc4" based =20
release, you have to build the release again using the one you build =20
with "HAVE_GCC=3D4" ... You can also try HAVE_GDB=3D6 ... in order to =20=

have a complete up to dat release :D

The idea is to compile more than one time the GCC in order to be well =20=

optimized. This is the method used in "LFS" ( Linux =46rom =20
Scratch ) ... Oupps LINUX :D

Let me know if it works for you ...

Best regards

Le 3 juil. 06 =E0 00:34, MKD a =E9crit :

> KlinT wrote:
>> "i386--netbsdelf-gcc: .: linker input file unused because linking =20
>> not done"
>>
>> You have to test with "HAVE_GCC=3D3 or HAVE GCC=3D4"
>>
>> I've got this error message a few days ago ...
>>
>> I'm able to build a complete release with HAVE_GCC=3D3
>>
>> Try this ... I know it's fastidious but this may solve your problem.
>>
>> What is the release you are using to build the current-release ?
>>
> I'm using NetBSD-3.0 to build the CURRENT. The main reason why I =20
> wanted to encourage with GCC4 was because of the optimizations with =20=

> Pentium-M, MMX and SSE.
>
> But I guess I'll have to use GCC3 by now, and maybe later GCC4 when =20=

> it gets fixed.
>
> Thanks guys, I really appreciate your help :)
>
>
> --=20
> Claudio M. Camacho
> http://www.claudiocamacho.org
>
>