Subject: Re: Patches for EST and SMP
To: None <tech-kern@netbsd.org>
From: Juan RP <juan@xtrarom.org>
List: current-users
Date: 03/18/2007 05:18:12
On Saturday 17 March 2007, Juan RP wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm posting patches for review and test. The patches do:
I fixed two things that were wrong right now:
* I was increasing atomically the counter in curcpu() two times, before
x86_broadcast_ipi().
* After a write with msr_cpu_broadcast_write(), ci->ci_msr_rvalue was not
updated with the new value, so it always had previous value.
A NetBSD user tested it for me with Enhanced Speedstep, and I tested it
with p4tcc, I can't see any problem and the value is read or written in all
CPUs correctly.
http://www.netbsd.org/~xtraeme/msr_ipi_handlers.diff
http://www.netbsd.org/~xtraeme/est_smp.diff
http://www.netbsd.org/~xtraeme/powernow_k8_smp.diff
Are there any problems with this code now?
Debugging output doesn't lie:
msr_cpu_broadcast_write: mcb->msr_value=30
msr_cpu_broadcast: ---- START ----
msr_cpu_broadcast: before write
msr_write_ipi: (cpu0) before write
msr_write_ipi: (cpu0) after write
msr_read_ipi: (cpu0) before read
msr_write_ipi: (cpu1) before write
msr_read_ipi: (cpu0) after read
msr_write_ipi: (cpu1) after write
msr_cpu_broadcast: after write
msr_read_ipi: (cpu1) before read
msr_cpu_broadcast: before pause
msr_read_ipi: (cpu1) after read
msr_cpu_broadcast: x86_msr_runcount=4 ncpu=2
msr_cpu_broadcast: after pause
cpu0: ci_msr_rvalue=0x30
cpu1: ci_msr_rvalue=0x30
msr_cpu_broadcast: ----- END -----
x86_msr_runcount is 4 because my system has two CPUs and a write operation
(msr_cpu_broadcast_write()), issues two operations (write and read):
counter = 0
write op (curcpu): counter++
write op (x86_broadcast_ipi): counter++
read op (curcpu): counter++
read op (x86_broadcast_ipi): counter++
counter = 4
--
http://plog.xtrarom.org/
Juan RP's blog - NetBSD/pkgsrc news in Spanish